Scrutia vs accessibility tools

Classic scanners only test a fraction of accessibility criteria. Discover why Scrutia goes further with a full WCAG 2.1 AA audit including keyboard navigation, ARIA components and code fixes.

Summary: Scrutia vs classic scanners

Summary comparison of features between Scrutia and classic scanners
FeatureWAVEaxe DevToolsLighthouseScrutia
WCAG criteria~30%~80 rules~35 rules106/106
Keyboard navigationYes
ARIA componentsBasicRolesBasicAPG patterns
Corrective codeYes
PDF report20+ pages
WCAG 2.1 AA nativeYes

Validated against 9 official RGAA audits (2024–2025)

±8 pts

average deviation

82%

concordance

106

criteria tested

See detailed validation →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Scrutia and WAVE?
WAVE only analyzes static HTML and covers about 20-30% of WCAG criteria. Scrutia tests all 106 RGAA criteria (mapped to WCAG 2.1 AA), including keyboard navigation, dynamic ARIA components and real interactions.
Are free scanners enough for a WCAG audit?
No. Free scanners like Lighthouse or axe detect basic technical errors but miss 70% of critical issues (keyboard, ARIA, interactions). A Scrutia pre-audit covers all 106 RGAA criteria mapped to WCAG 2.1 AA.
Does Scrutia replace a human audit?
No. Scrutia is a pre-audit that automatically evaluates 59 out of 106 criteria and identifies the remaining 47 for human verification. It prepares and accelerates the official audit, but does not replace it.

Convinced? Try Scrutia

106 RGAA criteria, keyboard navigation, ARIA components, code fixes. Results in 5 minutes, no commitment.

Run a free audit